Halo Vs Mass Effect

Halo Vs Mass Effect

Here we have a clash of two Sci-Fi franchises looking for bragging rights. I don’t know enough about the Mass Effect universe to give a fair estimation on who would win, so I’ll leave it to the good hands of the BankGambling readers.

Who wins?

Related Posts:



Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion.

Comments being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion can lead to the banhammer getting used. You can read more about our comments policy here.



6,626 Comments on "Halo Vs Mass Effect"

  1. Siggymansz April 6, 2010 at 6:42 am -      #201

    “actually mass effect do have an extremely good air force called the reapers. they would cause a lot of damage to halo as there are over 200 of them”

    if your talking bout the reapers i think your talking bout then they arnt AIR force really
    more like Navy but i guess you could call them a space force

    also i dont think there specs are ;listed anywhere so i guess you cant say they could be better or worse until we get the full picture

  2. cyborg pirate ninja jesus April 6, 2010 at 6:43 am -      #202

    yeh they are a pretty good space faring race however not a whole lot is known about them, like fire power shields etc so unless they appear as an inanimate object or as an abandoned ship and just mind control everyone. but other than that they wouldnt be too big of a threat given what we know about them.

    however ships like the pillar of autumn can fire at a power of more than 10 times that of the strongest me dreadnaught……the exact figure im not sure of although it in either this thread or me vs metroid.

  3. CRACKSHOT99 April 6, 2010 at 12:22 pm -      #203

    An Air Force is a Air units in the atmosphere of that certain planet, while a Navy is the units fighting on that planets sea or in space, but I can see why you would think that.

    Anyways, the UNSC has’nt got a good inter – planetary compared to the Covenant. It takes four UNSC Frigates to take out one Covenant Destroyer. And if you comapare Covenant fleets to Forerunner the odds would most probably be the same. I dont know the diffrence between certain Halo fleets and Mass Effect fleets so I cant put up a good debate

  4. j hud April 19, 2010 at 9:12 pm -      #204

    Halo-2553
    Mass Effect-2156?

  5. j hud April 19, 2010 at 9:15 pm -      #205

    Halo is set inthe year 2553. Mass Effect is set in 2183.

  6. Thexius May 14, 2010 at 2:12 pm -      #206

    In halo the marines are still using lead based weapons that require manual reload cept for the plasma weapons and what not, Mass effect has weapons that only overload. While only the MC has over shield/ significant battle armor in halo, all of the soldiers in mass effect have kinetic barriers, not to mention personnel with biotics. I dunno bout the ships and whatnot but ME just seems a little more advanced despite the year they take place.

  7. Justhuman May 14, 2010 at 3:02 pm -      #207

    Both games are great. Space-wise can be somewhat even with Halo having a slight edge. Mass effect however wins in ground engagements.

  8. Siggymansz May 15, 2010 at 2:23 am -      #208

    “dunno bout the ships and whatnot but ME just seems a little more advanced despite the year they take place.”

    Halo Ships got MAC cannons (1.17 teratons if you believe the canon Personally im in the Gigatons boat)
    whereas Mass Effect Dreadnoughts (the type oh ship that only other dreadnoughts or a fuckton of other ships can take) only get at max 300 kilotons

  9. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 2:30 am -      #209

    “(1.17 teratons if you believe the canon”

    do the people at Bungie know what a teraton is?

  10. Siggymansz May 15, 2010 at 2:43 am -      #210

    “do the people at Bungie know what a teraton is?”
    i doubt it

  11. Siggymansz May 15, 2010 at 2:43 am -      #211

    but it is canon

  12. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 2:46 am -      #212

    “but it is canon”

    so then, I am guessing that a fuel-rod guns canon power is around a gigaton or two?

  13. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 2:56 am -      #213

    wait a second, I refuse to believe they could possible think a mac cannon is capable of a teraton of damage, and I have a hard time thinking even 1 gigaton… that is fucking ridiculous… that is impossible…

  14. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 3:12 am -      #214

    are you sure 1.17 teratons? not 1.17 gigatons? or 11.7 gigatons? or 117 gigatons?
    I could accept those numbers… but a damn teraton… wow

  15. Locutus May 15, 2010 at 3:57 am -      #215

    Is 1.17 teratons from an actual canon source or just Halopedia?

  16. Cargo May 15, 2010 at 4:35 am -      #216

    “Is 1.17 teratons from an actual canon source or just Halopedia?”

    Halopedia, seems a tad bit high.

  17. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 4:42 am -      #217

    “Halopedia, seems a tad bit high.”

    figures

  18. Locutus May 15, 2010 at 4:47 am -      #218

    A few months ago, Halopedia said MACs did a few dozen kilotons. Then it said it did a few hundred gigatons. Then again it was changed to just over a petaton. Now it’s a teraton.

    Halopedia is crap.

  19. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 4:51 am -      #219

    “A few months ago, Halopedia said MACs did a few dozen kilotons. Then it said it did a few hundred gigatons. Then again it was changed to just over a petaton. Now it’s a teraton. ”

    honestly, I think a few dozen Kilotons seems right…

  20. Cargo May 15, 2010 at 4:54 am -      #220

    Another nail in the teraton coffin:

    factpile.com/goa-uld-mothership-vs-covenant-cruiser.htm#comments

    Scroll down to Comment #21.

  21. ZomBninjasamurai May 15, 2010 at 4:55 am -      #221

    okay mybe saying a few dozen kilotons seems right could be an under estimate… but MAC cannons haven’t really provided any immense feats

  22. Thexius May 16, 2010 at 2:45 am -      #222

    Indeed halos ships are more advanced but mass effects’ ground troops would destroy. But you gotta wonder if their ships are all that powerful if they still use lead based weapons? I mean if the people from mass effect needed to they use mass accelerators at their highest point to destroy their ships, at the cost of a horrible recoil of course.

  23. Siggymansz May 16, 2010 at 4:24 am -      #223

    1.17 teratons is from Halo encyclopedia (not the wiki. the Halo BOOK) the same Book that has MA5C at 300 meters

    “Is 1.17 teratons from an actual canon source”
    yes

    “so then, I am guessing that a fuel-rod guns canon power is around a gigaton or two?”
    no that makes no sense its like saying We have ICBMs that make huge fucking craters and blow up citys therefore our rocket launchers shoot ICBM like rockets (that level citys in 1 blast)

    @thexius
    Yes ground troops would destroy halos (halos are SHIT) but its space that really matters in any meaningful way

  24. Siggymansz May 16, 2010 at 4:27 am -      #224

    NOTE I to think 1.17 teratons is Retarded as crap that is why I Go with the 1.17 Gigatons

  25. Laharl May 16, 2010 at 5:09 am -      #225

    “but its space that really matters in any meaningful way”
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kYN-ZA0sL4
    6:16-6:17 how many of those things are there?
    And why does it feel like they are the least of their problems?
    I don’t think this match can be decided till Mass Effect 3.

  26. ZomBninjasamurai May 16, 2010 at 5:13 am -      #226

    “6:16-6:17 how many of those things are there?”

    more than a couple

  27. Siggymansz May 16, 2010 at 5:40 am -      #227

    “I don’t think this match can be decided till Mass Effect 3.”
    me to we need to know MOAR about the Reapers
    Hence
    “but its space that really matters in any meaningful way”
    because the Better Space Force can just OB whatever planet or Strike at Key ground Positions (if they need resources or someshit)

  28. CRACKSHOT99 May 16, 2010 at 3:36 pm -      #228

    Thexius@

    “Indeed halos ships are more advanced but mass effects’ ground troops would destroy. But you gotta wonder if their ships are all that powerful if they still use lead based weapons? I mean if the people from mass effect needed to they use mass accelerators at their highest point to destroy their ships, at the cost of a horrible recoil of course.”

    True, Halo ground troops would lose to Mass Effect ground troops but the need for battle on the ground would not be needed if the Halo Navy ruled the space lanes. Why send down an army of UNSC and waste there lives when you can bombard them with figheters or ‘glass’ the ground forces from the sky.

  29. Locutus May 16, 2010 at 4:42 pm -      #229

    “1.17 teratons is from Halo encyclopedia (not the wiki. the Halo BOOK) the same Book that has MA5C at 300 meters”

    Halo: Fall of Reach says 1.17 gigatons. From what I have read, both are the same level of canon. So which source do we use?

  30. Zervziel May 16, 2010 at 5:34 pm -      #230

    Halo Encyclopedia is newest, so it could count as a retcon. Plus events in Halo: FoR has been retconned many times.

  31. renesaG May 18, 2010 at 6:25 pm -      #231

    Wow its been long. What I think is halo would win. Covenant alone could since they have energy weapons, high charity, 5km ships, slipspace technolgy, and AI. Just so you know they do have AI its in one of the books. Im thinking first strike.

  32. renesaG May 18, 2010 at 6:30 pm -      #232

    @justhuman”mass effect would win in ground engagements”

    I’ve never seen a large scale ground military for mass effect, but halo is a different story

  33. Siggymansz May 18, 2010 at 8:14 pm -      #233

    “Halo: Fall of Reach says 1.17 gigatons. From what I have read, both are the same level of canon. So which source do we use?”

    What Zervziel Said
    “Halo Encyclopedia is newest, so it could count as a retcon. Plus events in Halo: FoR has been retconned many times.”

  34. renesaG June 2, 2010 at 11:38 am -      #234

    I say halo for ground engagements. They have grizzlies, warthogs, hornets, falcons, longswords, banshees, wraiths, ghosts, prowlers, phantoms, and scarabs.

  35. lord cthulhu June 13, 2010 at 10:46 am -      #235

    if were talking unsc before the covent war, i would say mass effect. in mass effect the citidel fleets are much larger then earth, they have shields, and high efficenty weapons. but it is possible for halo to win they have in comparison to mass effect SUPERFAST FTL ability, we can’t count the mass relay’s becuase, mass effect will probably be the attackers,and the relays only exist in ME universe.
    sorry for spelling

  36. RenesaG June 13, 2010 at 10:54 pm -      #236

    Masseffect only has about80dreadnoughts in total so that’s not much to brag about. They’re also a kilometer long which is pretty small in the halo universe. I also forgot to mention a few other vehicles in the halo verse like the vulture and wolverine. Since the covenant are joined with unsc would they be able to reverse engineer covenant technology to make it more powerful like cortana did in first strike. So halos space and ground troops are several times more advaced than ME’s except for the marines.

  37. cyborg pirate ninja jesus June 14, 2010 at 1:18 am -      #237

    “I’ve never seen a large scale ground military for mass effect, but halo is a different story”
    ” say halo for ground engagements. They have grizzlies, warthogs, hornets, falcons, longswords, banshees, wraiths, ghosts, prowlers, phantoms, and scarabs.”

    bahahaha i laugh at your idiocy mass effect ground forces are far far far stronger than any ground forces halo could hope to throw at them.
    hell i would give a single ME soldier a decent chance against a covenent wraith

    factpile.com/krogans-vs-brutes.htm/comment-page-1#comments
    read post 20

  38. Darkbladex96 June 14, 2010 at 1:28 am -      #238

    @Cyborg pirate ninja jesus

    1. is there something shorter i can call you?

    2. i didnt respond to him because it was stupid.

    besides we know that an Allience soldier from mass effect can do exactly what MC does….probably easier since his weapons are stronger and his armor is tougher.
    that soldier vs a scarab….id give it to the soldier based on the new load out style from ME2 a soldier can carry 4 small arms and a heavy weapon, and according to the book those disc grenades are standard issue.

    he’ll destroy a scarab quite easily.

  39. OriginalA June 14, 2010 at 2:26 am -      #239

    “1. is there something shorter i can call you?”

    First rule of Cyborg Pirate Ninja Jesus: His name only gets LONGER. Hence why I call him Cyborg Space Pirate Ninja Crystal Dragon Raptor Jesus.

  40. Laharl June 14, 2010 at 2:30 am -      #240

    “First rule of Cyborg Pirate Ninja Jesus: His name only gets LONGER.”
    Cyborg Space Pirate Ninja Crystal Dragon Raptor Jesus Devil the 3rd!

  41. OriginalA June 14, 2010 at 4:20 am -      #241

    I don’t think you quite understand the joke here, Laharl.

  42. renesaG June 15, 2010 at 9:19 am -      #242

    @Cyborg pirate ninja jesus
    what evidence is there of mass effect ground engagements. I have the games there is none , but i don’t have the books Also you should check out the new E3 trailer of the halo reach campaign at ign. It shows how halo armies are pretty powerful especially with all the thousands of elites being dropped from orbit in pods.

  43. renesaG June 15, 2010 at 9:21 am -      #243

    An alliance soldier vs a scarab, i’d put all the money in the world on the scarab. I don’t think the alliance soldier or any soldier from masseffect could jump high enough to even get on the scarab.

  44. renesaG June 15, 2010 at 9:23 am -      #244

    @Darkbladex96
    Did you see the ME 2 cinematic when thane puched those eclipse mercs while they were in their armor? That really says a lot.

  45. alfieboi13 June 15, 2010 at 11:46 am -      #245

    @renesaG

    you are the biggest halo fanboy ever! every fight you are defending them! you comment 3 or 4 times in a row with little sentences that mean nothing!!!

  46. cyborg pirate ninja jesus June 15, 2010 at 9:52 pm -      #246

    once i reach 1000 comment i will change my name….which should be soon

  47. renesaG June 16, 2010 at 11:52 am -      #247

    @alfieboi13
    And? Who cares, halo wins this one.

    you are the biggest halo fanboy ever! every fight you are defending them! you comment 3 or 4 times in a row with little sentences that mean nothing!!!

    Same could be said about you. You’re at every masseffect and halo related thread i’ve been to defending mass effect.

    I nominate halo for the FP.

  48. renesaG June 17, 2010 at 11:54 am -      #248

    why are mass effect and halo always fighting? i think they should team up and battle someone else. it would be epic seeing them working together against a common enemy.

  49. alfieboi13 June 26, 2010 at 3:13 pm -      #249

    @renesaG

    ‘Same could be said about you. You’re at every masseffect and halo related thread i’ve been to defending mass effect.’

    actually, i don’t. in saren v boba fett i support Boba not Saren. I also thought that hk would beat wrex.

    So, I don’t support Mass Effect in EVERY fight unlike you with Halo

  50. X on June 26, 2010 at 3:36 pm -      #250

    Whats stopping the UNSC from upgrading there ground weapons/armour to Mass Effect levels?

  51. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 3:42 pm -      #251

    I nominate halo for the fp.

  52. X on June 26, 2010 at 3:44 pm -      #252

    I also nominate halo for a stomping victory.

  53. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 3:51 pm -      #253

    “I also nominate halo for a stomping victory.”
    images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/thumb/9/94/Coolguyhalo.jpg/200px-Coolguyhalo.jpg

  54. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 4:03 pm -      #254

    “I also nominate halo for a stomping victory.”
    “http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/thumb/9/94/Coolguyhalo.jpg/200px-Coolguyhalo.jpg”

    You better support that claim !

  55. ZomBninjasamurai June 26, 2010 at 4:22 pm -      #255

    “Whats stopping the UNSC from upgrading there ground weapons/armour to Mass Effect levels?”

    probably the same thing that made them think an open canopy tank was a good idea

  56. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 4:32 pm -      #256

    “probably the same thing that made them think an open canopy tank was a good idea”
    I guess that explains why MC is like this.

  57. X on June 26, 2010 at 4:40 pm -      #257

    “probably the same thing that made them think an open canopy tank was a good idea”

    Right…

    The real answer is nothing. I have no doubt the first few battles will have the UNSC smashed but you’d have to be a stupid, ignorant, anti-halo wanker to think they wouldn’t upgrade.

    Hey what! Now that i think about it most dumb-asses on this site are just like that!

  58. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 4:45 pm -      #258

    “but you’d have to be a stupid, ignorant, anti-halo wanker to think they wouldn’t upgrade. “Why didn’t they upgrade in all of their other battles hmm?
    alot of seem like downgrades if you ask me maybe they will downgrade instead?

  59. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 4:46 pm -      #259

    “but you’d have to be a stupid, ignorant, anti-halo wanker to think they wouldn’t upgrade. “Why didn’t they upgrade in all of their other battles hmm?
    alot of it seem like downgrades if you ask me maybe they will downgrade instead?

  60. ZomBninjasamurai June 26, 2010 at 4:49 pm -      #260

    “The real answer is nothing. I have no doubt the first few battles will have the UNSC smashed but you’d have to be a stupid, ignorant, anti-halo wanker to think they wouldn’t upgrade. ”

    they never upgraded against the Covenant, they just used their downgraded from modern weapons… nonetheless Halo wins this… they have superior ships… and as it is known: Orbital superiority>ground superiority not to mention, its not just UNSC vs Mass Effect, its Halo vs Mass Effect… and the Covenant would rape Mass Effect with no lube

  61. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 4:55 pm -      #261

    “and the Covenant would rape Mass Effect with no lube”
    As far as we know mass Effect 3 could turn it around easily so I wouldn’t count it out.

  62. X on June 26, 2010 at 4:57 pm -      #262

    “Why did’t they upgrade in all of their other battles hmm?”

    See you prove my point.

    The UNSC would always get hammed in space forcing them back all the time. Ground combat wasn’t that imported, it also helps that the Covvies aren’t so much better then them that they couldn’t fight back with what they had.

    Now the UNSC has the upper ground and can take however fucking long they want to upgrade there stuff, add to the fact they did try upgrade things and had on a few times. Means that they will.

    “allot of it seem like downgrades if you ask me maybe they will downgrade instead?”

    Thats because you’re stupid.

  63. ZomBninjasamurai June 26, 2010 at 5:01 pm -      #263

    “As far as we know mass Effect 3 could turn it around easily so I wouldn’t count it out.”

    Mass Effect 3 isn’t out yet, theres not even a trailer, and I doubt they’ll have hundreds of years of technological advancement in one game

  64. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 5:14 pm -      #264

    “I doubt they’ll have hundreds of years of technological advancement in one game”
    You never know…
    They could just expand the universe alot since it is the last mass effect in the trilogy.

    “Mass Effect 3 isn’t out yet, theres not even a trailer”
    Guess we all have to wait a long time then.

    “Thats because you’re stupid.”
    Why did you alter my quotes in small ways?
    You know you can just copy and paste right?

    “Ground combat wasn’t that imported,”
    Sure it wasn’t important when you wanted to take a planet without much harm to it or defend it when the enemy has broken through the planetary defense systems of your base of operations and landed.
    Yep,not important at all.
    Nope,not important at all.

  65. Swifterdeath June 26, 2010 at 5:24 pm -      #265

    “Nope,not important at all.”

    Considering the ME universe’s chance of breaking through Halo defenses, are thin to non-existent… yeah not a problem. And the fact that the UNSC are more likely to just nuke ME planets (They have a code that is effectively ‘Planet rebelled, nuke it’), they also wont have to worry about that.

    Soo… why would they need to even have ground combat?

  66. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 5:36 pm -      #266

    “Why didn’t they upgrade in all of their other battles hmm?
    And where did they not upgrade ? The fact that your fighting against a technological superior foe that won’t leave anything alive in its wake…which means that the UNSC would have even less resources to work with during total war means that they won’t waste anymore time using resources on something that risks being completely impractical.
    “alot of seem like downgrades if you ask me maybe they will downgrade instead?”

    Its like your counting on a sequel.

    Yeah…because despite all the advanced technology the UNSC has that were “upgraded” in multiple fields of science, I guess all of a sudden they’ll feel like downgrading.
    Right…I totally agree with your very intelligent theory.

    “As far as we know mass Effect 3 could turn it around easily so I wouldn’t count it out.”

    Yeah in one game, suddenly the plot advances 200 years and their ships suddenly are much stronger !
    And since Mass effect 3 isn’t out yet
    Halo wins

  67. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 5:39 pm -      #267

    “Halo wins”
    geez you guys can’t read sarcasm well….

  68. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 5:43 pm -      #268

    “Sure it wasn’t important when you wanted to take a planet without much harm to it or defend it when the enemy has broken through the planetary defense systems of your base of operations and landed.
    Yep,not important at all.
    Nope,not important at all.”

    Why bother when your forces are smart enough to realize that maybe they should destroy the fleet and halt all resources for the enemy when ground combat suddenly seems ineffective.

    ” defend it when the enemy has broken through the planetary defense systems of your base of operations and landed.”
    Yeah of course that will happen, even though your vastly superior ships will happen to go dumbstruck and make sure they don’t scan for any foreign ships.

  69. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 5:47 pm -      #269

    “geez you guys can’t read sarcasm well….”
    Sorry…my heartless computer can’t read facial expressions or recognize differences in tone.
    Yeah, I guess I need to upgrade this piece of crap 21th century computer, to that of which can magically detect sarcasm.
    Or try rewording.

  70. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 6:01 pm -      #270

    “Sorry…my heartless computer can’t read facial expressions or recognize differences in tone.
    Yeah, I guess I need to upgrade this piece of crap 21th century computer, to that of which can magically detect sarcasm.
    Or try rewording.”
    ——————/´ ¯/)
    —————–/—-/
    —————-/—-/
    ———–/´¯/’–‘/´¯`•_
    ———-/’/–/—-/—–/¨¯\
    ——–(‘(———- ¯~/’–‘)
    ———\————-‘—–/
    ———-‘\’————_-•´
    ————\———–(
    Always wanted to try this.
    Knowing my luck it won’t work.

  71. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 6:27 pm -      #271

    ——————/´ ¯/)
    —————–/—-/
    —————-/—-/
    ———–/´¯/’–’/´¯`•_
    ———-/’/–/—-/—–/¨¯\
    ——–(‘(———- ¯~/’–’)
    ———\————-’—–/
    ———-’\’————_-•´
    ————\———–(
    “Always wanted to try this.
    Knowing my luck it won’t work.”

    Oh so now someone is feeling like a A-hole because he can’t appreciate some top quality humor.
    Nice artwork BTW
    ——————/´ ¯/)
    —————–/—-/
    —————-/—-/
    ———–/´¯/’–’/´¯`•_
    ———-/’/–/—-/—–/¨¯\
    ——–(‘(———- ¯~/’–’)
    ———\————-’—–/
    ———-’\’————_-•´
    ————\———–(

    Right back at ya !

  72. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 6:36 pm -      #272

    “——————/´ ¯/)
    —————–/—-/
    —————-/—-/
    ———–/´¯/’–’/´¯`•_
    ———-/’/–/—-/—–/¨¯\
    ——–(‘(———- ¯~/’–’)
    ———\————-’—–/
    ———-’\’————_-•´
    ————\———–(

    Right back at ya !”
    cherylwong.glogster.com/talk-to-the-hand/

    www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=talk%20to%20the%20hand

  73. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 6:44 pm -      #273

    @ Laharl
    Actually, by this definition.
    Talk to the hand-A saying used to ignore and disregard a comment or an insult when you can’t think of a way to counter it.
    You made me feel so much better.
    Now I can think of it as a compliment.
    Thanks

  74. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 6:46 pm -      #274

    Meh…
    “”I am enjoying my ignorance. Please do not ruin it by discussing facts or logic with me.” Used primarily by low-brow talk show guests and other adults who read at a third grade level.”
    Wow…another definition.
    i have learned so much in these last few seconds about the complex understanding of human Psychology !
    If only that were true.

  75. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 6:46 pm -      #275

    Meh…
    “”I am enjoying my ignorance. Please do not ruin it by discussing facts or logic with me.” Used primarily by low-brow talk show guests and other adults who read at a third grade level.”
    Wow…another definition.
    i have learned so much in these last few seconds about the complex understanding of human Psychology !
    If only that were true.
    www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=talk%20to%20the%20hand

  76. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 6:58 pm -      #276

    “Now I can think of it as a compliment.
    Thanks”Welcome,but number 7# just is to much for me.
    cdn.indowebster.com/www43.indowebster.com/b02bd1f31f73c994b966bc7363179cd6_thumbnail.gif

  77. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 7:06 pm -      #277

    #7
    “An invitation to carry on your conversation with someone’s hand.”
    lolz

  78. ZomBninjasamurai June 26, 2010 at 7:12 pm -      #278

    “An invitation to carry on your conversation with someone’s hand.”

    an ever difficult proposition

  79. orpheus12 June 26, 2010 at 9:07 pm -      #279

    Oh, umm, maybe I wouldn’t want to carry on a conversation with a hand if it has been in a rather *unpleasent* location.

  80. Cargo June 26, 2010 at 9:34 pm -      #280

    “Oh, umm, maybe I wouldn’t want to carry on a conversation with a hand if it has been in a rather *unpleasent* location.”

    But how would one know that?

  81. ZomBninjasamurai June 26, 2010 at 9:37 pm -      #281

    “But how would one know that?”

    I for one have my ways

  82. Ahremos June 26, 2010 at 10:19 pm -      #282

    halo.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Magnetic_Accelerator_Cannon

    Pretty much shows the absolute ridiculousness of 1.17 teratons…

  83. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 10:33 pm -      #283

    “Pretty much shows the absolute ridiculousness of 1.17 teratons…”
    That is just utter(lol) bull shit
    Even I can put that much power out at once no way it is in the tera tons.

  84. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 10:34 pm -      #284

    Even I *can’t* put that much power out at once no way it is in the tera tons.
    typo*

  85. Siggymansz June 26, 2010 at 10:35 pm -      #285

    “if were talking unsc before the covent war, i would say mass effect. in mass effect the citidel fleets are much larger then earth, they have shields, and high efficenty weapons. but it is possible for halo to win they have in comparison to mass effect SUPERFAST FTL ability, we can’t count the mass relay’s becuase, mass effect will probably be the attackers,and the relays only exist in ME universe.
    sorry for spelling”

    LOL the UNSC before OR After the Covenant War will ROFL STOMP!!! (Minus Reapers) All the Citadel and Terminus Systems without Help

    (Even IF the UNSC didn’t Outclass Mass Effect Ships in Every way (Except FTL but even then Mass Effect FTL is Shit (not because of Speed) They could just win By Weight of Numbers/Industrial Strength)

    Mass Effect FTL and why its Shit

    1.Can only go FTL for 50 Hours before Your Crew is Cooked inside their own Ship

    2.When appearing in a System from FTL your Broadcasting Your Appearance to Every Sensor in said System

    3. To avoid these problems you need to go through Mass Relays which are FIXED Stations If you don’t understand why that is Bad GTFO

  86. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 10:38 pm -      #286

    Why mass effect loses it is more realistic and has more proof in everything.

  87. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 10:40 pm -      #287

    “Even I *can’t* put that much power out at once no way it is in the tera tons.
    typo*”Stupid mistake I can blow up planets to absolute rubble on the fly I am way above teraton range.

  88. Siggymansz June 26, 2010 at 10:44 pm -      #288

    There IS a difference between TT lvl KE and TT lvl Explosions

  89. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 10:47 pm -      #289

    “There IS a difference between TT lvl KE and TT lvl Explosions”
    Like what?

  90. Cjrodarte June 26, 2010 at 10:54 pm -      #290

    the only one I can think of to overpower Laharl is the Hulk.

  91. Siggymansz June 26, 2010 at 11:05 pm -      #291


    Like what?”

    .while I didn’t major (or Minor for that matter) in any of the Shit that would Qualify me to Answer that (and what i say could be VERY VERY WRONG)

    I’m pretty Sure the Answer is alot like the Difference between a Normal Explosion and a Nuclear Explosion
    ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_nuclear_explosions )

    So To Answer your question
    (Take with 2 1/2 teaspoons of Salt and 1 Teaspoon of Sugar then bake for 30 mins at 150o)

    The Kinetic onezz Punches through something with Great force (May be Smallish Explosion)

    the Explosion (in atmo) Kils all life on planet for lolz(or something to that Effect…so it might not kill all life..but it will Remove Atmo (in the area? or all i don’t know)

  92. Laharl June 26, 2010 at 11:12 pm -      #292

    “the only one I can think of to overpower Laharl is the Hulk.”
    Depends how he feels if he is pissed I see it ending with the hulk dieing from a planet busting attack before he gets angry enough or if he is a good mood and pisses the hulk off enough hulk has a decent chance.
    That and it depends if he doesn’t just cut his head off with a lightsaber at ftl speeds or not.
    I’m tired night kinda why my posts are all meh.

  93. Siggymansz June 26, 2010 at 11:14 pm -      #293

    “I’m tired night kinda why my posts are all meh.”
    Night its 2 in the Afternoon???? (lol at timezones)

  94. Cjrodarte June 26, 2010 at 11:19 pm -      #294

    unless you killed betty ross then it’s over for you Laharl.

  95. X on June 26, 2010 at 11:25 pm -      #295

    “Why mass effect loses it is more realistic and has more proof in everything.”

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH.

  96. Cjrodarte June 26, 2010 at 11:27 pm -      #296

    so mass effect losses then?

  97. L-W June 26, 2010 at 11:53 pm -      #297

    Mass Effect is the “harder” science fiction certainly, as the authors (even if it makes little or no sense) actually go to great lengths to appeal to a realistic setting that is internally consistent with the technology they’ve created. Even a brief glance at the Codex is proof of their dedication to research, dissect, disseminate and create a presentable universe that is at least built around a logically sound frame (I wish more fictional series would publish and maintain a Codex during production).

    Halo is built more like Star Trek in terms of inconsistent technobabble nonsense; they have 4,000 ton vessels firing 600 ton projectiles at half the speed of light with giant impulse engines powered by ultra-dense deuterium fusion cores that somehow generate more energy than the equivelant amount of antimatter, 10,000 ton mile long purple Cruisers with inferior power generation that are capable of glassing a planet within a day whilst powering their shields with terrawatt reactors, nukes that are capable of scorching half a planet and shattering the nearby moon despite the fact that the sheer energy alone would allow the bomb to generate its own gravitational field equal to an astral body, have shields that can repel hundred ton objects moving at half the speed of light, but have hulls that behave more like wet tissue paper when struck, can pull 1000+ G accelerations but sink like a stone when caught in a 6 G gravitational body, they still consider slingshot maneuvers to by viable for stellar travel and posses armor that can survive proximity nuclear detonations but is boiled away by overheated ground reactors that a pair of soldiers on foot can outmaneuver, or torn off by the friction heat of an atmospheric free-fall.

    Did I mention that the same guys who use 600 ton tungsten rounds at half the speed of light (despite the fact that tungsten would turn to vapor at such speed) did so without a stable artificial gravity system for a number of years?

    As I said, Halo is as soft as Star Trek when it comes to internal consistency.

  98. Cjrodarte June 26, 2010 at 11:56 pm -      #298

    what about star wars?

  99. Siggymansz June 26, 2010 at 11:59 pm -      #299

    “so mass effect losses then?”
    yes.Badly

  100. Cjrodarte June 27, 2010 at 12:01 am -      #300

    so award or no award?

Leave A Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.